Every rapid intensification in the official best tracks since 1978 — a rise of 30 kt or more in 24 hours —
put to the independent evidence: what the aircraft measured, what the satellites saw, what the climatlas Best Track made of it,
the environment it happened in and the imagery.
Ryan Maue · climatlas
Loading…
How independently is each one known?
A verdict from the independent voices alone
Independent support for the book's rapid intensifications, by basin and era
Share of each basin's episodes by verdict (count at the right). Hover a segment for the numbers. The table below lists every episode.
The 2005 question
More rapid intensification in the books since 2005: the storms, the imagery, or the writing?
Rapid intensification per storm-day, each source against its own 1989–2004 rate
RI episodes per 100 storm-days at tropical-storm strength, divided by the same source's 1989–2004 rate (so 1.0 = no change;
the sources differ in level — 10-minute agencies use a 25-kt threshold — and only the shape is comparable). Whiskers: storm-block bootstrap 90%.
Hover a point for the rates.
Every episode
Find one
Every voice through the episode
What the smoother decided
Top: the probability, at each 3-hour step, that the climatlas Best Track v0.6 took a large trend step there — where it
concluded the storm was changing fast. Bottom: the probability it gave each satellite reading of being a gross failure (a pinhole eye the
8-km imagery cannot resolve, a misplaced centre) and so discounted it.
The environment
The imagery
What the verdict is and is not. It asks only whether an independent voice shows the rise: the aircraft, or the
satellite-only reanalysis. "Book only" does not mean the storm did not intensify rapidly — satellites smooth and under-read small, fast
storms, and the book's analysts had imagery, microwave passes and ship reports this site does not hold. It means nothing here can confirm
it. The thresholds sit below 30 kt on purpose, because every independent voice is noisier and smoother than the book. The environment is
context: the CBT does not use it.